Tuesday, 17 January 2017

AMD Radeon R9 Nano


The AMD Radeon R9 Nano ($649) is an exceptionally minimal, yet effective illustrations card with a smaller than expected ITX-accommodating structure figure. In spite of the fact that you're paying a premium for its size, the R9 Nano's execution is better than that of other little, air-cooled cards. In the event that you don't have to spare space, however, you can get more power at the cost.

The R9 Nano is only 6 inches long, however conveys more power than many anticipated that earlier would its points of interest being declared. It highlights the full Fiji design processor, not a stripped-down rendition, and conveys the same 4,096 stream processors and 4GB of High-Bandwidth Memory (HBM) found in AMD Radeon Fury cards. This much power is an aid for those building a framework in minimized PC cases, as the card is fit for 4K gaming.

All things considered, notwithstanding having fundamentally preferred execution over different cards this size, similar to the Asus GeForce GTX 970 DirectCU Mini, the R9 Nano's cost may give you delay. Its rundown cost of $649 is the same as the all the more intense fluid cooled AMD Radeon R9 Fury X and comparably estimated to the Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti. These cards are greater, however are vastly improved entertainers. Unless you completely require the little frame figure for your work, there's no reason not to go for the prevalent cards at a similar cost.

With a 1,000MHz clock speed and the effective HBM, the R9 Nano could produce great benchmark test results and run requesting 3D recreations at great edge rates. In spite of its size, the R9 Nano figured out how to outpace the Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 by 8 percent on the 3DMark Fire Strike test, however that card is $150 less costly, and landed only 6 percent behind the AMD Strix R9 Fury. The 4K gaming test results were great: The R9 Nano figured out how to pull inside a couple casings of the Nvidia GTX 980 Ti while running Sleeping Dogs at 4K determination.

The AMD Radeon R9 Nano is likely the best card yet as far as execution per-inch, however that is not precisely an institutionalized estimation when you are thinking about which GPU to decide for your PC manufacture. In the event that you genuinely require the little size for your case, no minimized card coordinates its execution, and the general plan is noteworthy. On the off chance that you can fit a standard card, however, you're in an ideal situation with the AMD R9 Fury X or the Nvidia GTX 980 Ti, for unrivaled execution at a comparative cost.

0 comments:

Post a Comment